Water and Taxes

54 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2016 Last revised: 29 Sep 2016

Dave Owen

University of California - Hastings College of the Law

Date Written: September 2, 2016

Abstract

This article considers how water consumption in the United States is taxed, and how it should be taxed. It reviews the few federal and state tax code provisions that directly target water use and the somewhat larger number of provisions with indirect implications for water policy. It also draws upon existing literature on tax policy, water law, and water economics to evaluate whether taxation of water consumption makes sense.

That analysis leads to two key conclusions. First, although provisions of tax law affect water use, and although some provisions undercut key policy goals of water law, they do so only to a modest extent. The intersections between the two fields are limited and largely inadvertent. Second, the interconnections between the fields should be stronger; water use should be taxed. The reasons are similar to commonly-cited justifications for carbon taxes and other so-called Pigouvian taxes: taxation would encourage more efficient water consumption, decreasing the negative environmental and energy consequences of water overuse and alleviating conflict among competing users. Taxation also would raise revenue, which could fund badly-needed water infrastructure and governance or reduce the need to tax more socially desirable activities.

Suggested Citation

Owen, Dave, Water and Taxes (September 2, 2016). UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 214. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834126

Dave Owen (Contact Author)

University of California - Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Rank
280,203
Abstract Views
240