The Staying Power of Civil Rights Litigation: Policing Post Settlement

20 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2016

See all articles by Rachil Davids

Rachil Davids

University of Michigan Law School, Law School - JD Candidate Author

Date Written: May 6, 2016

Abstract

This paper focuses on the staying power of civil rights litigation post-settlement. Specifically, through an examination of Battle v. City of New York, I focus on the usage of civil rights litigation settlements in bringing down an entrenched practice, like stop and frisk, as well as discussing the legacy of Battle itself. Though I do not purport to make any definitive statements regarding the efficacy of civil rights litigation on the whole, I draw tentative conclusions about the propensity for civil rights litigation to break down a widespread and illegal practice. I make these conclusions while focusing on a single case and dealing with a specific issue of law, i.e., the constitutionality of passenger searches under the Taxi/Livery Robbery Inspection Program (TRIP).

Keywords: Battle, City of New York, New York City, Taxi/Livery Robbery Inspection Program, TRIP, Stop, Frisk

JEL Classification: K4, K40, K41, K42, K49, K10, K19

Suggested Citation

Davids, Rachil, The Staying Power of Civil Rights Litigation: Policing Post Settlement (May 6, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2835103 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2835103

Rachil Davids (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School, Law School - JD Candidate Author ( email )

Ann Arbor, MI
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
253
PlumX Metrics