European Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
28 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2016 Last revised: 15 Nov 2016
Date Written: September 6, 2016
Have investment treaty arbitrators responded to the so-called ‘legitimacy crisis’ that has beleaguered the international investment regime in the past decade? There are strong rational choice and discursive-based reasons for thinking that arbitrators would be responsive to the prevailing ‘stakeholder mood.’ However, a competing set of legalistic and attitudinal factors may prevent arbitrators from bending towards the arc of enhanced sociological legitimation. This article draws upon a newly created investment treaty arbitration database to analyze the extent and causes of a shift in treaty-based arbitration outcomes. The evidence suggests that arbitrators are conditionally reflexive: sensitive to both negative and positive signals from states, especially vocal, influential and developed states.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Langford, Malcolm and Behn, Daniel, Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator? (September 6, 2016). European Journal of International Law, Forthcoming ; PluriCourts Research Paper No. 16-14. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2835488
By Julian Arato