China's Bold Strategy for Semiconductors – Zero-Sum Game or Catalyst for Cooperation?

East-West Center Working Papers: Innovation and Economic Growth Series, No. 9, September 2016

21 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2016 Last revised: 19 Sep 2016

See all articles by Dieter Ernst

Dieter Ernst

East-West Center; Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)

Date Written: September 7, 2016

Abstract

This paper explores whether China's bold strategy for semiconductors will give rise to a zero-sum game or whether it will enhance cooperation that will benefit from increased innovation in China.

As the world's largest producer and exporter of electronic products, China is by far the top market for integrated circuits (ICs), accounting for nearly a third of global demand. Yet its ability to design and produce this critical input remains seriously constrained. Despite decades and many billions of dollars of state-led investment, China's domestic production of semiconductors covers less than 13% of the country's demand.

As a result, China's IC trade deficit has more than doubled since 2005, and now has surpassed crude oil to become China's biggest import item. To correct this unsustainable imbalance, China seeks to move from catching up to forging ahead in semiconductors through progressive import substitution. The "National Semiconductor Industry Development Guidelines (Guidelines)" and the "Made in China 2025" (MIC 2025) plan were published by China's State Council in June 2014 and May 2015, respectively. Both plans are backed by huge investments and a range of support policies covering intellectual property, cybersecurity, procurement, standards, rules of competition (through the "Anti-Monopoly Law"), and the negotiation of trade agreements, like the Information Technology Agreement. The objective is to strengthen simultaneously advanced manufacturing, product development and innovation capabilities in China's semiconductor industry as well as in strategic industries that are heavy consumers of semiconductors.

Until recently, China has focused primarily on logic semiconductors and mixed-signal integrated circuits for mobile communication equipment (including smart phones), and on the assembly, testing and packaging of chips. Since the start of the 13th FYP, China's semiconductor industry strategy now covers a much broader range of products and value chain stages, while at the same time increasing the depth and sophistication of its industrial upgrading efforts. This important new development is at the center of this paper.

Based on a review of policy documents and interviews with China-based industry experts, I will describe key policy initiatives and stakeholders involved in the current strategy; highlight important recent adjustments in the strategy to broaden China's semiconductor product mix; and assess the potential for success of China's ambitious efforts to diversify into memory semiconductors, analog semiconductors, and new semiconductor materials (compound semiconductors). The chances for success are real, giving rise to widespread worries in the US and across Asia that China's bold strategy for semiconductors may result in a zero-sum game with disruptive effects on markets and value chains. However, Chinese semiconductor firms still have a long way to go to catch up with global industry leaders. Hence, global cooperation to integrate China into the semiconductor value chain makes more sense than ever, both for the incumbents and for China.

Keywords: China, innovation policy, industrial policy, semiconductors, impact on global semiconductor industry, zero-sum game, international cooperation

JEL Classification: F68, 014, 025, 032, 038, 053

Suggested Citation

Ernst, Dieter, China's Bold Strategy for Semiconductors – Zero-Sum Game or Catalyst for Cooperation? (September 7, 2016). East-West Center Working Papers: Innovation and Economic Growth Series, No. 9, September 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836331 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2836331

Dieter Ernst (Contact Author)

East-West Center ( email )

1601 East-West Road
Honolulu, HI 96848-1601
United States

Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) ( email )

57 Erb Street West
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
904
rank
175,188
PlumX Metrics