The Evolution of Authorship: Work Made by Code

7 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2016

See all articles by Annemarie Bridy

Annemarie Bridy

University of Idaho; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society

Date Written: September 8, 2016

Abstract

This short article — a transcript of remarks from the Kernochan Center’s fall 2015 symposium, “Copyright Outside the Box” — considers whether U.S. copyright law requires human authorship as a precondition for protection of an artistic work. Tracing the surprisingly long history of copyright law’s grappling with the status of computer-generated works, I ask whether the increasing sophistication and independence of generative code should cause us to rethink embedded assumptions in the law about the meaning and origin of creativity and authorship.

Because copyright law already accommodates non-human authors (i.e., corporations) through the work made for hire doctrine, I argue here (revisiting my 2012 article Coding Creativity) that recognition of AI authorship may be a less profound doctrinal leap than it may seem. Other countries already protect works generated autonomously by computers. In the United States, we can decide for policy reasons that machine-authored works should not be protected by copyright, but that choice is not inevitable given the current state of the law both here and abroad.

Suggested Citation

Bridy, Annemarie, The Evolution of Authorship: Work Made by Code (September 8, 2016). Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 39, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836568

Annemarie Bridy (Contact Author)

University of Idaho ( email )

PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0051
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.uidaho.edu/law/people/faculty/abridy

Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society ( email )

Palo Alto, CA
United States

HOME PAGE: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/people/annemarie-bridy

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
367
Abstract Views
1,386
rank
81,047
PlumX Metrics