Compram Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’
EURO 2016 Conference, Poznan - WC-21: Methodology of Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development, stream Methodology of Societal Complexity / Large Conference Area: Operational Research in Health, Life Sciences and Sports / July 6, 2016, Wednesday, 12:30-14:00, Room: Building CW, ground floor,
69 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2016
Date Written: July 6, 2016
Abstract
COMPRAM Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’ is a research study/paper dedicated to the:
* Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524/5AD) - the author of the <
This dedicated research study/paper is aggregated and is presented by Professor Dr. Nicolae Bulz - Professor Dr. Dorien DeTombe and Eliza-Cristina Bulz within the in session EURO 2016 Poznan - WC-21: Methodology of Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development , stream Methodology of Societal Complexity. Area: Operational Research in Health, Life Sciences and Sports, July 6, 2016, Wednesday, 12:30-14:00 / Room: Building CW, ground floor, Room 025. The co-authors are acting within Euro Working Group „Methodology of Societal Complexity”. The Chair of the embedding scientific activity is: Prof. Dr. Dorien DeTombe International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe / Euro Working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity DeTombe@nosmo.nl www.complexitycourse.org/doriendetombe.html
The study [COMPRAM Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’] considers and contributes on three research stages:
- The experience on the beyond time approach to complexity by the Roman philosopher Boetius’ Consolation of Philosophy 523 AD, and Professor Dorien DeTombe’s COMPRAM Methodology; - The Knowledge Transfer from the structural nexus within COMPRAM Methodology toward the contemporary (re-)structuring of the ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’; - The Knowledge Transfer from the above two research stages to the analytical enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities.
- There are minimal pre-requisites - Modelling and Simulation/Emulation of the Complex Societal Problems are starting within three stages at [any possible] University level(s): (1) Temporal series; (2) Analytical models; (3) COMPRAM Methodology.
The original contribution of this study presents and addresses this research stage: Modelling and Simulation/Emulation of the Complex Societal Problems AND Interactive Modelling - interactively including COMPRAM Methodology – within a (new) analytical domain of Knowledge Elicitation and Transfer AND Theory, Praxis, Logic: GENEROSITY – SOLIDARITY – CREATIVITY.
The contemporary ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’ is a contemporary [structural / functional / organizatoric] feature and pattern of the Social Networks versus Knowledge Transfer - i.e. A turning point within the <
So, this introduction and a brief presentation for the initial constrains could focuse on ‘necessity AND sufficiency’ cheching from the cognitive and related praxis for this study, as:
NECESSITY: It is revealed, here and now, within the relevance of the current ‘state of art’ of the GLOBAL WOLD POST-CRISIS (2008-2012) – IT IS NOT TO REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKES / ERRORS.
SUFFICIENCY: It is revealed, here and now, within the current ‘state of art’ of the GLOBAL WOLD TERRORIST WAR (2001/9/11) - but to critically recollect on the World Wars: WW1 (1914-1919), WW2 (1939-1945), ‘Cold’ WW (cca. 1950 toward 1989).
The main lines of this study are:
1: A surprising equivalence between Consolation of Philosophy and Methodology for Societal Complexity (COMPRAM)
1.I: Consolation of Philosophy, by Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524 or 525), and 1.II: Methodology for Societal Complexity, by professor Dorien J. DeTombe [Defining complex interdisciplinary societal problems. A theoretical study for constructing a co-operative problem analyzing methodology: the methodology COMPRAM. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers Amsterdam (thesis), 1994, 439 pp.]
2: Towards the attaining of a subtle (desired) representation-support, here and now, it is worth to simulate, through a personalist-cognitive track the environment of social qualitative data. The result is presented into the coupled graphics, as below: 2.1: CERN – 2012: Higgs’ particule (bosom) offical announcement – Large Hadron Collinder 2.1.2: A jointed (pe)view onto the MACRO and MICROCOSM 2. 2: Human Embryo 2. 3: Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 (archeological findings - Bronze Age, 4,000 y.b.) 2.4: MACROCOSM 2.5: WHY THERE IS NOT HUMANKIND’S COMPLETENESS AND CONSISTENCY WITHIN TRUE, GOODNESS, BEAUTY, MORALITY, VALUE, BEST PRAXIS, …? 2.6: WHY …? e.g. Murchinchinson oil platform (decommissioning began in the fourth quarter of 2013 and is expected to continue for approximately five years. Plugging and abandoning of the 33 platform wells that have subsea tie-backs to three remote wells began in late 2013.) – versus Piper Alpha catastrophe (6 July 1988, killing 167) 200 years Aberdeen harbor growth 3: A type of reflection onto, into and by society. A paradigm of societal modeling: Interactive Modeling
4: A paradigm of complex recurrence. The resolutive solution of a model to comprise: ego, world, nature, society, thinking The following cognitive and interactive model would be devoted to sustain the existence of a complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory. 4.1. The infra and hyper-incursion is due to connectedness. The anticipation is due to communication. 4.2 . The world of Paradoxes is a crystal or a broken one as are the harmonization regarding connectedness and communication.
Ending paragraph (e.p.): e.p.1. The project <
e.p.2: INVITATION: Partnership within the new project applications: HORIZON 2020, and Creative e-Europe
e.p.3.: A Cosmological Model – within Science-Religion Dialogue / author: Nicolae Bulz within an interactive modelling stance of/for/by the team of the project “What is Truth?” - St Andrew’s Cathedral Aberdeen, Scotland, UK - as part of the program <
Just at this stage of the research the posibilities (and the related cognitive-expositive domains) regarding the presentation and expand of this study are, only and only, within an inter/trans-disciplinary – intercultural – aecumenic effort as thesis and subtle attained profoundness within the matter. Here and now, all these are to be expressed by two variances – related to different focusing within ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’:
Variance 1 / INTERDISCIPLINARY CONTEXT(S) / consonat to the sonor background: Claire de Lune - DEBUSSY
‘Negative’ samples - CHRITMAS TRUCE: DECEMBER 25 1914 - Terrorism fear, today
THE CORE: Cosmological Model_1 (axiomatic) - Last stage bio-anthropologic research - Neuro and Cognitive perspectives ‘Positive’ samples - DARWIN – LAMARK’s absent dialogue - ADN, mind and consciousness as a set of (universal) tools [“I Dream a Dream” – case study] - SOCIAL NETWORKS – Science-Religion Dialogue’s Econometric elicitation(s) [A case study] Variance 2 / TRANSDISCIPLINARY CONTEXT(S) / consonat to the sonor background: Claire de Lune - CHOPIN
‘Negative’ samples - Thomas KEMP’s and Adam MORTON’s reflections on EVIL - DANTE’s and BOTICELLI’s reflections on Earthly and beyond Earthly World(s) THE CORE: Cosmological Model_2 (interactive and subtle_axiomatic) - Last stage Micro and Macro-Cosmos researches - Neuro, Bio, and Quantum Computing perspectives ‘Positive’ samples - From Stephan ODOBLEJA’s non-edited manuscripts (Drobeta - Tr. Severin State Archive) - From Mihai DRAGANESCU’S Consciousness Society; Basarab NICOLESCU’s Transdisciplinary construct; Constantin V. NEGOITA’s Fuzziness and Post-modernity construct; Mircea MALITZA’s Geo-(post)modernity construct
This current presentation of this original research stance is presenting, also, at the end the following creative-stimulative patterns:
** Input<=>Output stance of the circular, rhythmic and labyrinthic string: Input<=> <=> INFORMATION<=>KNOWLEDGE<=> <=>EXPERTISE<=> <=>WISDOM<=>HAPPINESS/ALIENATION<=>
<=>Output
*** Probabilistic, fuzzy, and subtle representation / resolution stance on human being: SUFFERING FORGIVING EVIL GOOD SIN LOVE PUNISHMENT SALVATION
Keywords: Complex Societal Problems - COMPRAM Methodology, Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities, ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’, Social Networks - Knowledge Transfer Initial Constrains – Necessity AND Sufficiency
JEL Classification: A19, A29, B311, C59, C99, D29, D59, D89, D99, I39, J29, Q49, Z00, Z10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation