The Agenda-Setter for Complex Litigation

21 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2016

Date Written: September 15, 2016

Abstract

I am honored to be allowed to contribute to this collection in recognition of Chief Judge Edward Becker, who has long been at the forefront in developing sensible ways for addressing a variety of issues that lie at the heart of handling modern complex litigation. As I reflected on Judge Becker's contributions to this area on which I have focused my professional career, it struck me that the right theme for this essay would be the judge's role as an agenda-setter. For me, he first set that agenda nearly twenty years ago when I was working on my first civil procedure article, and he has kept doing so ever since.

In political circles, it is widely appreciated that setting the agenda is a way to control the outcome of the game. Stalin, for instance, was able to achieve power in the early Soviet Union in significant measure because as General Secretary he controlled the agenda for the Politburo. But judges do not get to set their own agendas; it is one of the hallmarks of Anglo-American judges that they take what comes to them by the luck of the draw. Others ‒ mainly the litigants ‒ set the agenda for judges. So judges cannot control the game in the same way.

Despite these institutional constraints, Judge Becker has set the complex litigation agenda for decades. In part, it is because he set the agenda in other capacities than as a sitting judge. For example, he was a catalyst behind the creation of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. In part, it is because the Judiciary has called on him to serve as an agenda-setter as a member of its Long Range Planning Committee. In part, it is because his incredible energy allows him to reach out to the practicing bar and academic communities along with carrying out his many judicial duties.

Suggested Citation

Marcus, Richard, The Agenda-Setter for Complex Litigation (September 15, 2016). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 149, 2001, UC Hastings Research Paper No. 187, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2839494

Richard Marcus (Contact Author)

UC Hastings Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-565-4829 (Phone)
415-565-4865 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
9
Abstract Views
194
PlumX Metrics