Accountability in a Regime Complex: Charting Policy Reforms for Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Prepared for the 2016 American Political Science Association Meetings, Panel on Judicialization of International Relations

35 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2016

Date Written: September 2, 2016

Abstract

Investor-state dispute settlement is a prime example of a regime complex, with thousands of bilateral treaties laying out standards of treatment, hundreds of ad hoc tribunals issuing interpretations, and a patchwork of multilateral treaties and national laws establishing enforcement provisions. While some states have expressed negotiators' remorse, the complexity of the system makes re-contracting difficult. This paper leverages data from original interviews with investment arbitrators to identify aspects of the system that are problematic from normative efficiency and fairness perspectives. It then proposes a set of sequenced policy reforms that could address these problems in the next U.S. administration.

Keywords: Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Regime Complex, Adjudication, Legislation

JEL Classification: F53, F55

Suggested Citation

Tucker, Todd, Accountability in a Regime Complex: Charting Policy Reforms for Investor-State Dispute Settlement (September 2, 2016). Prepared for the 2016 American Political Science Association Meetings, Panel on Judicialization of International Relations, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2840217

Todd Tucker (Contact Author)

Roosevelt Institute ( email )

4079 Albany Post Rd.
Hyde Park, NY 12538
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
1,218
Rank
297,839
PlumX Metrics