Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Drawing a Non-Consequentialist Line: Augmenting v. Replacing the Professions with Computer Systems

39 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2016 Last revised: 4 May 2017

Sylvie Delacroix

University College London - Faculty of Laws

Date Written: September 18, 2016

Abstract

This paper draws a line between those occupations that may eventually lend themselves to wholesale AI replacement on consequentialist grounds, in contrast to those that should not. This requires demarcating the professions from other types of expert service providers. Of those expert services whose safe delivery is in the public interest, healthcare, legal/financial services and education stand out because they give rise to a very particular type of vulnerability, one that potentially threatens the moral equality of those seeking those services (the particular case of those shaping the architecture conditioning our virtual interactions will also be discussed). This paper delineates the ethical demands stemming from this vulnerability, which is contrasted to the kind of vulnerability that characterises all lay-expert relationships given their inherent knowledge asymmetry. This contrast turns out to matter both conceptually and normatively: the legitimacy of – less and less hypothetical – wholesale replacement of some professionals by computer systems indeed hinges upon this contrast between different kinds of vulnerability. When our life is in the hands of an expert, our vulnerability may in some cases be lessened by wholesale AI replacement. Yet when, aside from this “primary” vulnerability, a professional can affect our less tangible ability to be the author of our own lives (in a way that commands respect both from ourselves and others), replacing such professionals with computer systems would imperil our commitment to moral equality – no less.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, augmentation, expertise, habit, professions, habituation, ethics, expert systems, vulnerability, automation bias

Suggested Citation

Delacroix, Sylvie, Drawing a Non-Consequentialist Line: Augmenting v. Replacing the Professions with Computer Systems (September 18, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2840864

Sylvie Delacroix (Contact Author)

University College London - Faculty of Laws ( email )

Gower St
London WC1E OEG, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/academics/profiles/index.shtml?delacroix

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Rank
176,466
Abstract Views
469