Exploitation as Domination: A Response to Arneson

Forthcoming in Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (2016)

10 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2016  

Nicholas Vrousalis

Leiden University - Institute of Political Science

Date Written: September 2, 2016

Abstract

In a recent paper Richard Arneson criticizes the domination account of exploitation and attributes it to me and Allen Wood. In this paper, I defend the domination account against Arneson's criticisms. I begin by showing that the domination view is distinct from the vulnerability-based view defended by Wood. I also show that Alan Wertheimer's influential account of exploitation is congenial to the domination view. I then argue that Arneson's own fairness-based view of exploitation generates false negatives and trivializes the concept of exploitation, rendering it entirely parasitic on the notion of unfairness.

Keywords: Luck Egalitarianism, Exploitation, Domination

JEL Classification: D63, B14, B51

Suggested Citation

Vrousalis, Nicholas, Exploitation as Domination: A Response to Arneson (September 2, 2016). Forthcoming in Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2848616

Nicholas Vrousalis (Contact Author)

Leiden University - Institute of Political Science ( email )

Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
PO Box 9555
Leiden, 2300 RB
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
82
rank
280,755
Abstract Views
193
PlumX