Chapter Four: Quarantine and the Problem of the Third Man

18 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2016 Last revised: 28 Oct 2016

See all articles by Michael Louis Corrado

Michael Louis Corrado

University of North Carolina School of Law

Date Written: October 7, 2016

Abstract

Non-retributive attempts to justify punishment are open to some of the same objections that retributive attempts are subject to. Should we return to the preventive Quarantine Model? The attempt to justify that approach by analogy to medical quarantine fails. But Pereboom, Slobogin, and Robinson have raised a problem that I would call the Problem of the Third Man: the problem of the sane and rational but undeterrable offender. Pereboom raises it in support of Quarantine, and the inability to deal with it must be added to the objections to retributive and non-retributive theories of punishment; the problem is to deal with it without adopting the Quarantine Model of criminal justice. The “double track” solution, I suggest, amounts to the tacking together of two unacceptable models and in any event is unstable.

Keywords: punishment, prevention, free will, double track

Suggested Citation

Corrado, Michael Louis, Chapter Four: Quarantine and the Problem of the Third Man (October 7, 2016). UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2849473, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2849473 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2849473

Michael Louis Corrado (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
733
Rank
739,379
PlumX Metrics