The Standard of Proof in Civil Competition Law Proceedings

6 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2016 Last revised: 20 Oct 2016

See all articles by Kelvin Hiu Fai Kwok

Kelvin Hiu Fai Kwok

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 8, 2016

Abstract

Discusses the relevant Hong Kong decisions (of the Court of First Instance recently in Television Broadcasts Ltd v Communications Authority [2016] 2 HKLRD 41; of the Court of Final Appeal in Koon Wing Yee v Insider Dealing Tribunal (2008) 11 HKCFAR 170) and UK decisions (of the Competition Appeal Tribunal in Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Director General of Fair Trading [2002] CAT 1; JJB Sports plc v Office of Fair Trading [2004] CAT 17; of the House of Lords in Re H (Minors) [1996] AC 563; Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499; Re B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2009] 1 AC 11) on the issue of the appropriate standard of proof in civil competition law proceedings. Argues that the application of the civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities in civil competition law proceedings classified as “criminal” for human rights purposes can be supported by two relevant factors: (i) the workability of the standards in light of the technical nature of the evidence involved; and (ii) the severity of the potential penalty.

Keywords: Competition Law, Standard of Proof, Balance of Probabilities, Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Human Rights, Presumption of Innocence, Right to a Fair Trial, Hong Kong Bill of Rights, ICCPR, ECHR, TVB v CA, Television Broadcasts v Communications Authority, Koon Wing Yee, Napp, JJB Sports

Suggested Citation

Kwok, Kelvin Hiu Fai, The Standard of Proof in Civil Competition Law Proceedings (October 8, 2016). 132 Law Quarterly Review 541 (2016); University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016/033. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2849761

Kelvin Hiu Fai Kwok (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law ( email )

Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
China

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
rank
154,876
Abstract Views
708
PlumX Metrics