The Shortsightedness of Blind Trusts

41 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2016

See all articles by Megan J. Ballard

Megan J. Ballard

Gonzaga University - School of Law

Date Written: 2007


This article presents an analysis of problems plaguing government officials’ use of blind trusts as a conflict of interest avoidance measure, and proposes changes to strengthen the device. In theory, a blind trust allows an independent trustee to manage a government official’s wealth, without the official knowing the identity of his or her assets. Unaware of their exact financial holdings, policy makers can render impartial decisions on matters that may affect their economic welfare. Blind trusts, however, do not always prevent public officials from knowing what assets they own. The federal statutory scheme governing blind trusts does not include sufficient incentives to avert the flow of information from trustees to policy makers. Because of this flaw, blind trusts can mislead the public into believing that decision makers are acting without knowledge of their financial affairs, when they may not be doing so. A blind trust that conceals a conflict of interest from public oversight undermines the transparency essential to democratic governance. This article recommends specific amendments to strengthen qualified blind trust rules so that the device can deter financial conflicts of interest and enhance public confidence in the integrity of official decision-making.

Suggested Citation

Ballard, Megan J., The Shortsightedness of Blind Trusts (2007). Kansas Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 43, 2007, Gonzaga University School of Law Research Paper No. 2016-14, Available at SSRN:

Megan J. Ballard (Contact Author)

Gonzaga University - School of Law ( email )

721 N. Cincinnati Street
Spokane, WA 99220-3528
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics