Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2851986
 


 



Originalism's Bite


William Baude


University of Chicago - Law School

Stephen E. Sachs


Duke University School of Law

November 28, 2016

20 Green Bag 2d 103 (2016)
Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2017-1

Abstract:     
Is originalism toothless? Richard Posner seems to think so. He writes that repeated theorizing by "intelligent originalists," one of us happily included, has rendered the theory "incoherent" and capable of supporting almost any result. We appreciate the attention, but we fear we've been misunderstood. Our view is that originalism permits arguments from precedent, changed circumstances, or whatever you like, but only to the extent that they lawfully derive from the law of the founding. This kind of originalism, surprisingly common in American legal practice, is catholic in theory but exacting in application. It might look tame, but it has bite.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Originalism, Falsifiability, Abstraction, Positivist, Positivism, Posner

JEL Classification: K40, K39, K41


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 17, 2016 ; Last revised: January 13, 2017

Suggested Citation

Baude, William and Sachs, Stephen E., Originalism's Bite (November 28, 2016). 20 Green Bag 2d 103 (2016); Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2017-1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2851986

Contact Information

William Baude (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Stephen E. Sachs
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-8542 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.duke.edu/fac/sachs

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,199
Downloads: 500
Download Rank: 42,728