Agencies’ Obligation to Interpret the Statute

65 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2016

See all articles by Aaron J. Saiger

Aaron J. Saiger

Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: October 20, 2016


Conventionally, when a statute delegates authority to an agency, courts defer to agency interpretations of that statute. Most agencies and scholars view such deference as a grant of permission to the agency to adopt any reasonable interpretation. That is wrong, jurisprudentially and ethically. An agency that commands deference bears a duty to adopt what it believes to be the best interpretation of the relevant statute. Deference assigns to the agency, rather than to a court, power authoritatively to declare what the law is. That power carries with it a duty to give the statute the best reading the agency can. Notwithstanding substantial jurisprudential disagreement about what it means to give a statute its “best interpretation,” an agency does not abide its role when it seeks to achieve anything less. An agency is legally and ethically obligated to privilege what it views as optimal statutory interpretation over what it considers to be optimal policy. If the two conflict, as they sometimes will, the agency must act consistently with the former to the detriment of the latter. To behave otherwise is to fail to adhere to principles of legislative supremacy and fidelity to law.

Keywords: Administrative Law; legislation; Chevron; deference; judicial deference; Mead; Skidmore; legal ethics; statutory interpretation; agencies

Suggested Citation

Saiger, Aaron J., Agencies’ Obligation to Interpret the Statute (October 20, 2016). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 1231, 2016, Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2856470, Available at SSRN:

Aaron J. Saiger (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics