Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates

38 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2016

See all articles by Jan Gerrit Voelkel

Jan Gerrit Voelkel

Stanford University - Department of Sociology

Matthew Feinberg

University of Toronto

Date Written: October 20, 2016

Abstract

Moral reframing involves crafting persuasive arguments that appeal to the values of the target, but argue in favor or against something that target would typically oppose (Feinberg & Willer, 2015). Past research has shown moral reframing to be an effective strategy for persuading liberals to be more supportive of conservative positions, and conservatives to be more supportive of liberal positions. Extending this work, the current paper investigated the effectiveness of moral reframing in influencing attitudes about candidates running for political office. We argued that messages criticizing a conservative candidate crafted in a way that appeals to the moral values of conservatives can decrease conservative support for that person, while messages criticizing a liberal candidate crafted to appeal to the values of liberals can decrease liberal support for that person. We tested these claims in the context of the 2016 American presidential election. In Study 1 (n = 397), conservatives who read a message opposing Donald Trump grounded in the more conservative value of loyalty supported him less than conservatives reading a message grounded in fairness concerns. In Study 2 (n = 392), liberals presented with a message opposing Hillary Clinton appealing to the more liberal value of fairness were less supportive of Clinton than liberals in a loyalty-argument condition. These results extend the applicability of moral reframing to political candidates and highlight how it can be a useful tool for overcoming rigid stances partisans often hold regarding political candidates, and may provide a means for opinion change and political acceptance.

Keywords: Moral Psychology, Political Psychology, Influence

Suggested Citation

Voelkel, Jan Gerrit and Feinberg, Matthew, Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates (October 20, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2856536 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2856536

Jan Gerrit Voelkel (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Department of Sociology ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Matthew Feinberg

University of Toronto ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
612
rank
41,869
Abstract Views
2,913
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information