'The International Criminal Court and Complementarity'

12:1 Journal of International Law and International Relations 208-228, Spring 2016

23 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2016 Last revised: 11 Dec 2016

See all articles by Hilmi Zawati

Hilmi Zawati

Centre for International Accountability and Justice (CIAJ).

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

Pursuant to Article 17 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), where the provisions of the complementarity regime have been enshrined, the Pre-Trial Chamber I (PTCI) and the Appeals Chamber of the ICC have respectively declared the case against Abdullah Al-Senussi inadmissible and subject to domestic proceedings conducted by the competent Libyan authorities. The PTCI judges added that Libya is willing and able genuinely to prosecute and investigate this case. They asserted that their decision had been taken in accordance with the principle of complementarity, incorporated in the Rome Statute of the ICC. On 28 July 2015, the Appeals Court of Tripoli handed down its judgement in the case no. 630/2012, sentencing Abdullah Al-Senussi, Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi, and seven other former regime high-ranking officials to death by firing squad. The trial, which was critically undermined by serious due process violations, has underlined the failure of the Libyan transitional justice system to offer fair trials to defendants, and to deliver justice in post-Gaddafi-era. This perversion of justice has infringed the principles of fundamental justice — which imply insuring the defendant’s right to fair trial and sentence — and put the ICC’s complementarity regime on the horns of a dilemma. Despite being a fundamental principle open to interpretation, complimentarity served as a keyword in the establishment of the ICC. While ensuring States Parties’ sovereignty, complementarity constitutes a substantial element in determining the relationship between the ICC, as a court of last resort, and national criminal accountability mechanisms. This simply means that only perpetrators of serious international crimes would be prosecuted at the Court. This is compatible with the provisions of the Rome Statute, which provide that States should take measures at the national level to ensure the investigation, prosecution, and punishment of such crimes. In other words, the international community counts on national criminal systems to bring perpetrators to justice and to combat the culture of impunity. However, this arguable principle is the central objective of The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, a critical and timely work, edited by Carsten Stahn, professor of international criminal law and global justice at Leiden University, and Mohamed M. El Zeidy, legal officer at the Pre-Trial Chamber II of the ICC. This multidisciplinary work is grounded on theoretical inquiries and practical experiences, written by prominent legal scholars and senior actors in the international criminal judicial system. It consists mostly of scholarly contributions initially presented and discussed at the International Conference on the ICC and Complementarity, held at the Peace Palace and the Hague Campus of Leiden University between 15-16 September 2009.

Keywords: The International Criminal Court; Complementarity; Hilmi M. Zawati; Carsten Stahn; Mohamed M. El Zeidy; International Criminal Law; Libya

Suggested Citation

Zawati, Hilmi, 'The International Criminal Court and Complementarity' (2016). 12:1 Journal of International Law and International Relations 208-228, Spring 2016 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2857314

Hilmi Zawati (Contact Author)

Centre for International Accountability and Justice (CIAJ). ( email )

404 - 2340 Gold Street
Montreal, Quebec H4M 1S4
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
741
Abstract Views
1,162
rank
36,611
PlumX Metrics