Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard?

28 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2016 Last revised: 24 Nov 2016

See all articles by J. Anthony VanDuzer

J. Anthony VanDuzer

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section

Date Written: October 4, 2016

Abstract

October 24, 2016 – CETA’s investment dispute provisions have become a lightning rod for critics of the trade pact within Europe, but in its current form, the CETA text represents a significant improvement from past trade and investment deals according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Investor-state Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is it the Gold Standard?,” Tony VanDuzer concludes that CETA provisions address many of the critical objections emanating from within European Union (EU) states.

Keywords: Trade and International Policy

JEL Classification: F53, K33

Suggested Citation

VanDuzer, J. Anthony, Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard? (October 4, 2016). C.D. Howe Institute Commentary No. 459; Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2016-44. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2860319 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2860319

J. Anthony VanDuzer (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
214
Abstract Views
929
rank
149,947
PlumX Metrics