The Sound of Silence: International Treaties and Data Exclusivity as a Limit to Compulsory Licensing

European Intellectual Property Review 38(12), 744-754, 2016

11 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2016

See all articles by Gabriele Spina Ali

Gabriele Spina Ali

The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, Students

Date Written: October 31, 2016

Abstract

Among various grounds, data exclusivity is often criticised for impeding the correct functioning of the flexibilities guaranteed by the TRIPS Agreement in relation to compulsory licensing. Several commentators have noted that, in cases where a generic competitor obtains a non-voluntary license on a patented pharmaceutical compound, the impossibility of relying on the regulatory data submitted by a previous applicant prevents access to the market and therefore neutralises the effectiveness of the license. By thoroughly looking at the relevant international provisions and state practices, this article brings into question the soundness of these claims. International legal sources, once rightly interpreted, rarely limit the possibility to waive data exclusivity in a more stringent manner than in patent regimes, so that the real threat to compulsory licensing lies in the political disparities between developed and developing countries rather than in the substantive law of data exclusivity.

Keywords: Access to medicines; Compulsory licensing; Data protection; Developing countries; Pharmaceuticals; Preferential trade agreements; Regulatory bodies; TRIPS

JEL Classification: K19, K33

Suggested Citation

Spina Ali, Gabriele, The Sound of Silence: International Treaties and Data Exclusivity as a Limit to Compulsory Licensing (October 31, 2016). European Intellectual Property Review 38(12), 744-754, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2861726

Gabriele Spina Ali (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, Students ( email )

Pok Fu Lam
Hong Kong

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
195
Abstract Views
644
Rank
299,146
PlumX Metrics