The Timing of Retirement: a Comparison of Expectations and Realizations
39 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2002 Last revised: 7 Oct 2022
Date Written: June 1987
Abstract
In this paper, I employ data drawn from the Social Security Administration's Retirement History Survey (RHS) to study the accuracy of expectations concerning the timing of retirement. The RHS is ideally suited for this purpose, in that it collects information on retirement plans, and follows respondents through time so that one can identify actual dates of retirement. The data are consistent with the view that, when asked to report an expected date of retirement, individuals name the most likely date (i.e. a mode, rather than a mean). Furthermore, these forecasts are highly accurate. There is very little evidence that individuals' expectations were systematically biased during periods in which Congress legislated large real increases in social security benefits. This suggests either that the benefit increaser were anticipated, or that unanticipated changes in benefits have little effect on retirement. The paper also describes differences in the accuracy of expectations by population subgroup.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Predictive Validity of Subjective Probabilities of Survival
-
Longevity Expectations and Death: Can People Predict Their Own Demise?
By V. Kerry Smith, Donald H. Taylor, ...
-
Individual Subjective Survival Curves
By Li Gan, Michael D. Hurd, ...
-
Anticipated and Actual Bequests
By Michael D. Hurd and James P. Smith
-
How Do the Elderly Form Expectations? an Analysis of Responses to New Information