Enough and as Good: A Formal Model of Lockean First Appropriation

30 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2016 Last revised: 27 Sep 2017

See all articles by Brian Kogelmann

Brian Kogelmann

University of Arizona - Department of Philosophy

Benjamin Ogden

Texas A&M University, Department of Political Science

Date Written: September 26, 2017

Abstract

In developing a theory of the first appropriation of natural resources from the state of nature John Locke tells us that persons must leave “enough and as good” for others. Detailing exactly what this restriction requires divides right and left libertarians. Briefly, right libertarians interpret “enough and as good” as requiring no or very minimal restrictions on the first appropriation of natural resources, whereas left libertarians interpret “enough and as good” as requiring everyone be entitled to an equal share of unappropriated resources, able to claim no more beyond this equal share. This paper approaches the right versus left libertarian debate by developing a formal model that examines the welfare properties of different interpretations of the Lockean proviso. The model shows that underlying philosophical justifications for left libertarianism, when plausible assumptions hold, will actually be better served by a right libertarian proviso rather than a left libertarian one.

Suggested Citation

Kogelmann, Brian and Ogden, Benjamin, Enough and as Good: A Formal Model of Lockean First Appropriation (September 26, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862014 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2862014

Brian Kogelmann

University of Arizona - Department of Philosophy ( email )

Tucson, AZ 85721
United States

Benjamin Ogden (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University, Department of Political Science

College Station, TX 77843-4353
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
666
rank
225,103
PlumX Metrics