Universal Basic Income and the Welfare State

18 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2016

See all articles by Richard McGahey

Richard McGahey

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Date Written: October 31, 2016

Abstract

Welfare states are struggling with slow economic and job growth, fiscal pressures from rising benefit costs, demographic changes, and fears of structural economic transformation and job losses caused by information technology and computerization. This combination of factors has led some analysts to explore new ways to deliver welfare state benefits, or reconfigure them. But others speculate that existing welfare state policies have run their course, and cannot be easily repaired to cope with these multiple challenges, especially in the face of slower and less labor-intensive economic growth. Some advocates are calling for introducing a universal basic income (UBI), either as a floor to provide a basic level of subsistence, as a complement to existing welfare state policies, or in some cases as a replacement for the welfare state. Much of the current interest in UBI stems from a belief that technology is rapidly eliminating jobs faster than new ones can be created, and future job growth will be much lower. But the evidence on technological displacement seems too uncertain to justify major disruptions in the welfare state. Rather, the UBI debate might better focus on the over thirty-year strengthening of business’ economic power relations over labor.

Keywords: universal basic income, technology, artificial intelligence, welfare state, displacement

JEL Classification: J08, J68, J80, I38

Suggested Citation

McGahey, Richard, Universal Basic Income and the Welfare State (October 31, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2863954 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2863954

Richard McGahey (Contact Author)

Institute for New Economic Thinking ( email )

300 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor
New York, NY 10010
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
781
rank
29,538
Abstract Views
2,372
PlumX Metrics