U.S. Land Policy, Property Rights, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s
50 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2001
Date Written: September 2001
Abstract
The process of assigning property rights to land in the American Great Plains resulted in farms that were too small to be economically viable. These farms were prime contributors to the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. The path dependence resulting from the initial assignment of property rights on the Great Plains was slow to be corrected. The transactions costs of property rights reallocation from homesteads to larger farms were high, in part due to government intervention. Local politicians sought to retain the dense, Midwest-like population base that homestead settlement had fostered, and they successfully lobbied the Federal Government for subsidies to maintain small family farms. The result was a halting process of farm size adjustment between 1920 and 1982. This case illustrates the difficult economic problems that can be raised by an inappropriate assignment of property rights. It cannot be assumed that a more efficient allocation of rights with fewer negative effects will occur quickly.
Keywords: Property rights, Coase, Dust Bowl
JEL Classification: Q2, N4, N5, L5
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Zeynep K. Hansen and Gary D. Libecap
-
Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s
By Zeynep K. Hansen and Gary D. Libecap
-
Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930's
By Zeynep K. Hansen and Gary D. Libecap
-
The Self-Enforcing Provisions of Oil and Gas Unit Operating Agreements: Theory and Evidence
By James L. Smith and Gary D. Libecap
-
The Self-Enforcing Provisions of Oil and Gas Unit Operating Agreements: Theory and Evidence
By James L. Smith and Gary D. Libecap
-
Homesteading Rock: A Defense of Free Access Under the General Mining Law of 1872
By Andrew P. Morriss, Roger E. Meiners, ...