Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

What Did the Supreme Court Hold in Heffernan v. City of Paterson?

40 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2016  

Michael Lewis Wells

University of Georgia School of Law

Date Written: November 15, 2016

Abstract

As a favor to his mother, Jeffrey Heffernan picked up a political yard sign. His supervisors demoted him, in the mistaken belief that he had engaged in protected speech. In Heffernan v. City of Patterson, 136 S.Ct. 1412 (2016), the Supreme Court held that a public employee can sue a local government under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when a supervisor acts for constitutionally impermissible motives, even though he has not in fact exercised First Amendment rights. But the grounds for that holding are unclear. The Court may have ruled that the city, through its police chief, violated Heffernan’s First Amendment rights despite the lack of speech on his part. Or it may have ruled that the City is liable on § 1983 “official policy” grounds, even though it violated no constitutional right. This article examines each of these and argues that neither withstands scrutiny. A more convincing rationale for the outcome is that the Court in effect recognized a constitutional common law right. Alternatively, the arbitrary demotion may support recovery under the Equal Protection Clause on a “class of one” theory, though Jeffrey Heffernan did not pursue that approach and current doctrine seems hostile to it.

Keywords: First Amendment, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Free Speech, Equal Protection Clause, Public Employees, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

JEL Classification: K19

Suggested Citation

Wells, Michael Lewis, What Did the Supreme Court Hold in Heffernan v. City of Paterson? (November 15, 2016). 51 Ga. L. Rev. Online 1 (2016); University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-41. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2869953

Michael Wells (Contact Author)

University of Georgia School of Law ( email )

225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
133