The CFPB's Arbitration Rule: The Road Ahead

Proceedings of the NYU 69th Annual Conference on Labor: Mediation and Arbitration of Employment and Consumer Disputes (2017)

9 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2016 Last revised: 25 Feb 2017

David L. Noll

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School

Date Written: November 21, 2016

Abstract

In May 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it intended to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to bar consumer financial companies from invoking pre-dispute arbitration agreements to block consumer class actions. This comment considers the most serious threats to the Bureau's arbitration rule and concludes that its prospects are bad. Under Trump, banks and credit card companies will continue to avoid class-action litigation by mandating individual arbitration and there is little that supporters of the Bureau's rule can do about it.

Keywords: Arbitration, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, PHH v. CFPB

JEL Classification: K40, K41, K42, J52

Suggested Citation

Noll, David L., The CFPB's Arbitration Rule: The Road Ahead (November 21, 2016). Proceedings of the NYU 69th Annual Conference on Labor: Mediation and Arbitration of Employment and Consumer Disputes (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2873866 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2873866

David Noll (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School ( email )

NJ
United States

Register to support our free research

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
rank
282,574
Abstract Views
380
PlumX