Moral Hazard and the Us Stock Market: Analysing the 'Greenspan Put'
26 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2001
Date Written: September 7, 2001
Abstract
The risk premium in the US stock market has fallen far below its historic level, which Shiller (2000) attributes to a bubble driven by psychological factors. As an alternative explanation, we point out that the observed risk premium may be reduced by one-sided intervention policy on the part of the Federal Reserve which leads investors into the erroneous belief that they are insured against downside risk. By allowing for partial credibility and state dependent risk aversion, we show that this 'insurance' - referred to as the Greenspan put -- is consistent with the observation that implied volatility rises as the market falls. Our bubble, like Shiller's, involves market psychology: but what we describe is not so much 'irrational exuberance' as exaggerated faith in the stabilising power of Mr. Greenspan.
Keywords: Asset bubble, Monetary policy, Greenspan put, Risk premium
JEL Classification: G12, E52, D84
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Asset Bubbles, Domino Effects and 'Lifeboats' Elements of the East Asian Crisis
By Hali J. Edison, Pongsak Luangaram, ...
-
Moral Hazard and the Us Stock Market: The Idea of a 'Greenspan Put'
By Marcus H. Miller, Paul A. Weller, ...
-
Moral Hazard and the U.S. Stock Market: Analyzing the 'Greenspan Put'?
By Marcus H. Miller, Paul A. Weller, ...
-
Growth Expectations, Capital Flows and International Risk Sharing
By Olli Castren, Roger Stiegert, ...
-
World Finance and the Us 'New Economy': Risk Sharing and Risk Exposure
By Marcus H. Miller and Lei Zhang
-
Price Dividend Models, Expectations Formation, and Monetary Policy
By Nico Valckx
-
Too Big to Fail: A Misguided Policy in Times of Financial Turmoil