The Use (and Misuse) of European Human Rights Law in Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Chapter in Franco Ferrari (ed.), The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration (Juris, Forthcoming)

115 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2016 Last revised: 28 Jun 2017

See all articles by José E. Alvarez

José E. Alvarez

New York University School of Law

Date Written: November 23, 2016

Abstract

For some time, critics of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) have urged its arbitrators and litigants (particularly respondent states) to draw from other sources of international law, particularly human rights law, to promote interpretations of international investment agreements (IIAs) that cohere with other international legal regimes, including human rights values. Some have hoped that the use of human rights law would not only lessen the fragmentation of international law encouraged by self-regarding mechanisms such as ISDS but would also promote the "re-balancing" of IIAs to permit greater scope for sovereigns to regulate. This essay examines the ways European human rights law has been cited in publicly available investor-state awards. It finds considerable reliance on such citations in the largest known database of such awards. But close examination of such citations, including in the recent Philip Morris v. Uruguay case dealing with tobacco regulation, casts doubt on whether this reliance is likely to produce the results that some anticipate. Investor-claimants are as likely to cite to European human rights law as are respondent states. It is not at all clear from the results to date that recourse to human rights has either 'humanized' international investment law or made it more coherent.

Keywords: international law, international investment law, investor-state arbitration, human rights law

Suggested Citation

Alvarez, José Enrique, The Use (and Misuse) of European Human Rights Law in Investor-State Dispute Settlement (November 23, 2016). Chapter in Franco Ferrari (ed.), The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration (Juris, Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2875089

José Enrique Alvarez (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
667
Abstract Views
1,914
rank
38,387
PlumX Metrics