The Right to Redemption: Juvenile Dispositions and Sentences

27 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2016  

Katherine Hunt Federle

Ohio State University Moritz College of Law

Date Written: November 28, 2016


The punishment of juveniles remains a troubling yet under-theorized aspect of the criminal and juvenile justice systems. These systems emphasize accountability, victim restoration, and retribution as reasons to punish underage offenders. In fact, American juvenile systems will remove the most egregious offenders to criminal courts for trial and sentencing. The United States Supreme Court in recent years, however, has issued a number of opinions emphasizing that the Eighth Amendment requires that the punishment of children must account for their lesser moral culpability, developmental immaturity, and potential for rehabilitation. State courts also have begun to reconsider their own dispositional and sentencing schemes in light of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence.

The reality of ‘juveniles’ immaturity militates in favor of a right to redemption. This Article begins by discussing the available data about the number and types of dispositions juveniles receive, waivers to criminal court, and the criminal sentences imposed. The analysis also considers the collateral consequences for minors who are adjudicated delinquent or who are criminally convicted. The discussion then turns to the effects of juvenile and criminal court involvement on children and the subsequent impact on life outcomes. The analysis considers theoretical, jurisprudential, and constitutional implications of juvenile sentencing with a special emphasis on the Supreme Court’s recent decisions. This Article concludes with the proposal for the contours of a right to redemption and its implications for reform to the current system and suggests strategies for the individual defense lawyer.

Suggested Citation

Hunt Federle, Katherine, The Right to Redemption: Juvenile Dispositions and Sentences (November 28, 2016). Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 47, 2016; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 372. Available at SSRN: or

Katherine Hunt Federle (Contact Author)

Ohio State University Moritz College of Law ( email )

55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
(614) 292-9177 (Phone)
(614) 688-4202 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views