Due Process in Public University Cases

25 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2016

See all articles by Marie T. Reilly

Marie T. Reilly

Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law

Date Written: October 1, 2016

Abstract

The stakes are high for university students accused of misconduct. When expulsion is a possible sanction, an accused student faces a financial loss and a stigma that may preclude admission to another university or access to a career that requires a clean conduct record. For universities, the stakes are also high. Universities use student disciplinary processes to maintain a safe environment for learning and to convey and promote university and civic values. Discipline procedures are matters of public interest and criticism, particularly where the alleged misconduct is sexual. When student discipline processes are fair and perceived as such, these processes reinforce a culture of responsible and ethical behavior that will benefit students, faculty, and staff into the future. When discipline processes are perceived as unfair, irrelevant, or overly bureaucratic, the negative impact on the university is similarly profound and long-lasting.

Suggested Citation

Reilly, Marie T., Due Process in Public University Cases (October 1, 2016). Penn State Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 1001, 2016; Penn State Law Research Paper No. 26-2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2878856

Marie T. Reilly (Contact Author)

Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law ( email )

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
rank
368,114
Abstract Views
268
PlumX Metrics