Is There No 'I' in Team? Rational Players in Dynamic Team Competition
26 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2016
Date Written: July 8, 2016
Empirical literature consistently challenges the rationality assumption of individuals’ behaviour in dynamic situations and in teamwork environments. Here I examine rational forward-looking behaviour in a dynamic team competition with multi-period “battles”. Using field data from professional squash team tournaments (820 matches), I provide evidence consistent with the game-theoretical prediction of “strategic neutrality” in team matches: the outcomes of previous battles do not affect the outcome of the current battle. Further, by exploiting a unique feature that each battle is in itself a multi-period contest between two contestants, I exclude another psychological mechanism that might explain the neutrality result, thus establishing the empirical relevance of its game-theoretical foundation.
Keywords: Forward-Looking Behaviour, Strategic Neutrality, Dynamic Team Competition, Multi-Period Contest, Squash Tournament
JEL Classification: C31, C36, C72, D79, L83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation