Adam Smith's Theory of Violence and the Political-Economics of Development
49 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2016 Last revised: 1 Jun 2017
Date Written: January 16, 2017
What accounts for the differences in the “wealth of nations”; that is, the differing levels of opulence across countries? Adam Smith's argument is as relevant today as it was in his time. On the economic side, his answer is well-known: the division of labor, the role of capital accumulation, and the absence laws and regulations that encumber competition and markets. Yet Smith’s views about the failure to develop were not limited to economic issues, instead turning equally to politics and law. Violence is central to Smith's approach to development, and Smith scholars have systematically under-appreciated the importance of violence in his approach to economic and political development. In the face of episodic violence, individuals have little incentives to be industrious, to save, or to invest. Smith argued that development required three mutually reinforcing elements – liberty, commerce, and security; and further, that these conditions first arose in the towns. If commerce represents the development of markets, liberty and security provided the political, legal, and military infrastructure necessary to sustain markets in a potentially hostile environment.
Keywords: Adam Smith, poltical-economics of development, violence, markets, liberty, security
JEL Classification: B12, B25, D78, K00, N43, O52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation