Retiring Forum Non Conveniens

72 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2016 Last revised: 1 Aug 2017

Maggie Gardner

Cornell Law School

Date Written: December 6, 2016

Abstract

When it comes to transnational litigation in the federal courts, it is time to retire the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The doctrine, which allows judges to decline jurisdiction in cases they believe would be better heard in foreign courts, is meant to promote international comity and protect defendant fairness. But it is not well-designed for the former purpose, and given recent developments at the Supreme Court, it is dangerously redundant when it comes to the latter. This Article seeks to demythologize forum non conveniens, to question its continuing relevance, and to encourage the courts and Congress to narrow its scope of application so that, when the time is right, it may be fully interred.

Keywords: Transnational Litigation, Jurisdiction, Comity, Procedure

Suggested Citation

Gardner, Maggie, Retiring Forum Non Conveniens (December 6, 2016). 92 New York University Law Review 390 (May 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2881498

Maggie Gardner (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
rank
205,037
Abstract Views
522
PlumX