A Curious Criticism of Plain Language

12 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2016

Date Written: June 1, 2016

Abstract

This article addresses criticisms in a previous issue of Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD about three supposed “ideologies” of the worldwide plain-language movement. The criticisms are mainly based on sociolinguistic theory. The article explains why they do not hold up under any fair examination of what advocates actually say and do.

Keywords: Legal Writing, Rhetoric

Suggested Citation

Kimble, Joseph, A Curious Criticism of Plain Language (June 1, 2016). Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, Vol. 13, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2881592

Joseph Kimble (Contact Author)

Cooley Law School ( email )

300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
560
Abstract Views
1,857
Rank
99,897
PlumX Metrics