Discretionary Accruals: Earnings Management... Or Not?

Abacus, Forthcoming

25 Pages Posted: 10 Dec 2016 Last revised: 17 Oct 2017

See all articles by Andrew B. Jackson

Andrew B. Jackson

UNSW Australia Business School, School of Accounting

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 25, 2016


This paper discusses some limitations of discretionary accruals measures. While discretionary accruals are acknowledged to be noisy proxies for earnings management, they are still widely used in the literature. This paper attempts to explain from basic econometrics how discretionary accruals are estimated, and in doing so why they are inappropriate measures for earnings management. It is shown that decisions of peer firms will influence the regression coefficients, and hence residuals, in accruals models which may lead to false conclusions about earnings management in other firms. This point is emphasized using an artificially constructed firm with no changes in their fundamental performance, and hence no discretion in their accruals. I also note concerns about the inferences which is commonly not acknowledged in research. Finally, using AAERs and Enron as examples, I demonstrate how discretionary accruals do not capture what literature often claims.

Keywords: Discretionary Accruals, Earnings Management

Suggested Citation

Jackson, Andrew B., Discretionary Accruals: Earnings Management... Or Not? (November 25, 2016). Abacus, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2882910 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882910

Andrew B. Jackson (Contact Author)

UNSW Australia Business School, School of Accounting ( email )

Sydney, NSW 2052

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics