Lessons from the Limitation on Itemized Deductions

Posted: 25 Oct 2001

See all articles by Reed Shuldiner

Reed Shuldiner

University of Pennsylvania Law School

David J. Shakow

University of Pennsylvania Law School

Abstract

Commentators have long regarded section 68, the overall limitation on itemized deductions, as primarily a hidden increase in marginal rates. In this report, the authors use tax return data to show that the effects of the provision are more complicated. For most taxpayers, as expected, section 68 operates as an increase in the marginal rate on income (but not deductions). For a significant number of very-high-income taxpayers, however, section 68 operates as a true limitation on itemized deductions, permitting a deduction of only 20 cents on the dollar. In addition, commentators had failed to notice that section 68 operates to force a significant percentage of taxpayers to use the standard deduction rather than itemizing. By measuring more precisely the different ways section 68 applies, the authors gain a fuller picture of that section's effects on the tax rates faced by various taxpayers. More generally, their research demonstrates the importance of understanding the interaction between different provisions of the code and the danger in relying on aggregate and average data in making predictions.

Suggested Citation

Shuldiner, Reed and Shakow, David J., Lessons from the Limitation on Itemized Deductions. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=288427

Reed Shuldiner (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-6536 (Phone)
215-573-2025 (Fax)

David J. Shakow

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,660
PlumX Metrics