Evans v. UK: Three Grounds for Ruling Differently

Forthcoming, Stijn Smet and Eva Brems (eds), Conflicts of Rights at the European Court of Human Right, Oxford University Press, 2017

32 Pages Posted: 30 Dec 2016

See all articles by Eva Brems

Eva Brems

Ghent University-Universiteit Gent

Date Written: December 29, 2016

Abstract

This paper discusses the Grand Chamber judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Evans v. UK (2007), in the light of the author's views on how the European Court should address conflicts between Convention rights, as well as in the light of her views on an integrated perspective on human rights.

Keywords: European Court of Human Rights, conflicting rights, fragmentation

Suggested Citation

Brems, Eva, Evans v. UK: Three Grounds for Ruling Differently (December 29, 2016). Forthcoming, Stijn Smet and Eva Brems (eds), Conflicts of Rights at the European Court of Human Right, Oxford University Press, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2891312

Eva Brems (Contact Author)

Ghent University-Universiteit Gent ( email )

Coupure Links 653
Gent, 9000
Belgium

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
185
rank
352,406
PlumX Metrics