Antidumping and Retaliation Threats
37 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2001 Last revised: 9 Dec 2022
Date Written: November 2001
Abstract
This paper examines how the prospect of foreign retaliation affects the antidumping (AD) process in the United States. We separate the capacity for retaliation into two channels: (i) the capacity for foreign government retaliation under the dispute settlement procedures of the GATT/WTO system, and (ii) the capacity for foreign industry retaliation through reciprocal claims of dumping and the foreign pursuit of AD duties in countries with AD regimes. Using a nested logit framework and analyzing U.S. AD cases between 1980 and 1998, we find significant empirical evidence consistent with the theory that U.S. industry is influenced by the threat of reciprocal foreign ADDs in its decision of which foreign countries to name in the initial AD petition, and that the U.S. AD authority's antidumping decisions are influenced by the threat of foreign retaliation under the GATT/WTO dispute settlement mechanism.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Global Antidumping Database Version 1.0
By Chad P. Bown
-
The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings
By Thomas Prusa and Susan Skeath
-
The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings
By Susan Skeath and Thomas Prusa
-
Trade Deflection and Trade Depression
By Chad P. Bown and Meredith Crowley
-
Modern Commercial Policy: Managed Trade or Retaliation?
By Susan Skeath and Thomas Prusa
-
The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filings
-
Trade Remedies and World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: Why are so Few Challenged?
By Chad P. Bown