Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2897639
 


 



Motivated Cognition and Juror Interpretation of Scientific Evidence: Applying
Cultural Cognition to Interpretation of Forensic Testimony


Rebecca K. Helm


Cornell University, Law School

James P. Dunlea


Northwestern University, School of Law

March 22, 2016

Penn State Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2016

Abstract:     
This paper reports the results of a study investigating how jurors interpret and digest scientific evidence when it is presented to them in a trial setting and how differences in juror attitudes and education influence interpretation of scientific evidence. The study involved a sample of mock jurors recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (n=91). Study subjects each viewed a transcript of a mock legal case involving DNA evidence. Results suggest that when presented with conflicting expert testimony, jurors will interpret evidence in a way that is consistent with pre-existing attitudes or beliefs (such as political predispositions). Importantly, results suggest that a juror’s ability to do this and therefore the polarization between jurors of different political pre-dispositions increases as level of education increases. For jurors classified as Conservative, as education levels increased, the prosecution expert was rated as more credible and the defendant was found guilty more often. For jurors classified as Liberal, as education levels increased, the prosecution expert was rated as less credible and the defendant was found guilty less often. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 13, 2017  

Suggested Citation

Helm, Rebecca K. and Dunlea, James P., Motivated Cognition and Juror Interpretation of Scientific Evidence: Applying Cultural Cognition to Interpretation of Forensic Testimony (March 22, 2016). Penn State Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2897639

Contact Information

Rebecca K. Helm
Cornell University, Law School
Ithaca, NY
United States
James Patrick Dunlea (Contact Author)
Northwestern University, School of Law ( email )
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 222
Downloads: 64
Download Rank: 277,239
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper