Evidence-Based Policy and the Education Privatization Debate: Analysing the Politics of Knowledge Production and Mobilization through Bibliographic Coupling

International Journal of Educational Development, Forthcoming

30 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2017

See all articles by Antoni Verger

Antoni Verger

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Clara Fontdevila

Autonomous University of Barcelona

Ruarri Rogan

Fordham University, School of Law, Students

Thomas Gurney

Independent

Date Written: January 13, 2017

Abstract

Education privatization is one of the most polarized areas in education policy research internationally. A swath of highly contradictory empirical research surrounds the issue of private involvement in education provision on a variety of related-themes (voucher schemes, charter schools, freedom of school choice, school competition etc.). Yet, the fact that research on these themes is far from conclusive makes taking evidence-based policy decisions challenging, and generates opportunities for a range of intermediary organizations to promote their preferred policy alternatives in this particular area. Based on the application of bibliometric analysis techniques, this paper examines the intersection of evidence production, research brokering, and knowledge mobilization in education policy and, in particular, in the context of the education privatization debate. Our analysis focuses on a group of international agencies, namely the World Bank, the consultancy firm CfBT (now called Education Development Trust), the UK’s Department for International Education (DfID) that are internationally recognized for their role as knowledge brokers between the research community and policy-makers operating at a range of scales.

The paper first maps the epistemic configuration of the education privatization debate and follows by exploring how the knowledge products of the above-mentioned intermediary organisations fit within and engage with the different epistemic communities generated around such debate. Among other things, our research shows that intermediary organizations’ publications on education privatization tend to cite a limited (and usually non peer-reviewed) number of like-minded studies as a way to create an illusion of a general consensus around the advantages of quasi-markets and freechoice policies in education.

Keywords: Educational Developement

Suggested Citation

Verger, Antoni and Fontdevila, Clara and Rogan, Ruarri and Gurney, Thomas, Evidence-Based Policy and the Education Privatization Debate: Analysing the Politics of Knowledge Production and Mobilization through Bibliographic Coupling (January 13, 2017). International Journal of Educational Development, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2898808

Antoni Verger (Contact Author)

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Plaça Cívica
Cerdañola del Valles
Barcelona, Barcelona 08193
Spain

Clara Fontdevila

Autonomous University of Barcelona ( email )

Plaça Cívica
Cerdañola del Valles
Barcelona, Barcelona 08193
Spain

Ruarri Rogan

Fordham University, School of Law, Students ( email )

New York, NY
United States

Thomas Gurney

Independent

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
227
Abstract Views
1,144
rank
154,437
PlumX Metrics