Why People Obey the Law: Experimental Evidence from the Provision of Public Goods
34 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2001
Date Written: January 2002
Abstract
According to economists, severe legal sanctions deter violations of the law. According to legal scholars, people may obey law backed by mild sanctions because of norm-activation. We experimentally investigate the effects of mild and severe legal sanctions in the provision of public goods. The results show that severe sanctions almost perfectly deter free-riding. However, people also obey law backed by mild sanctions if it is accepted in a referendum. We show that voting for mild law induces expectations of cooperation, and that people tend to obey the law if they expect many others to do so.
Keywords: Deterrent Effect of Legal Sanctions, Expressive Law, Social Norms, Public Goods, Voting
JEL Classification: H41, D72, K42, H26, C92
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Expressive Law: Framing or Equilibrium Selection?
By Iris Bohnet and Robert D. Cooter
-
Is There an Expressive Function of Law? An Empirical Analysis of Voting Laws with Symbolic Fines
-
The Condorcet Jury Theorem and the Expressive Function of Law: A Theory of Informative Law
-
Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem
By Dan M. Kahan