Purchase - $5.00 NBER Subscribers Download

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

33 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2017  

Hunt Allcott

New York University (NYU)

Matthew Gentzkow

Stanford University

Date Written: January 2017

Abstract

Following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, many have expressed concern about the effects of false stories (“fake news”), circulated largely through social media. We discuss the economics of fake news and present new data on its consumption prior to the election. Drawing on web browsing data, archives of fact-checking websites, and results from a new online survey, we find: (i) social media was an important but not dominant source of election news, with 14 percent of Americans calling social media their “most important” source; (ii) of the known false news stories that appeared in the three months before the election, those favoring Trump were shared a total of 30 million times on Facebook, while those favoring Clinton were shared 8 million times; (iii) the average American adult saw on the order of one or perhaps several fake news stories in the months around the election, with just over half of those who recalled seeing them believing them; and (iv) people are much more likely to believe stories that favor their preferred candidate, especially if they have ideologically segregated social media networks.

Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Suggested Citation

Allcott, Hunt and Gentzkow, Matthew, Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election (January 2017). NBER Working Paper No. w23089. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2903810

Hunt Allcott (Contact Author)

New York University (NYU) ( email )

Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States

Matthew Gentzkow

Stanford University ( email )

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Rank
284,632
Abstract Views
814