Bank Loan Loss Provisions Research: A Review

Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 144-163

20 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2017 Last revised: 13 Sep 2017

See all articles by Peterson K Ozili

Peterson K Ozili

University of Essex - Essex Business School; Central Bank of Nigeria

Erick Rading Outa

Independent

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

We review the recent academic and policy literature on bank loan loss provisioning (LLP) to identify several advances in the literature, to highlight some challenges in LLP research and suggest possible directions for future research with some concluding remarks. Among other things, we observe some major advancement in country-specific and cross-country analyses and substantial interaction between LLPs and existing prudential, accounting, institutional firm characteristic, cultural, religious, tax and fiscal framework. We observe that managerial discretion in provisioning does not necessarily generate LLP estimates that reflect the true and underlying economic reality of banks’ credit risk exposure but rather managerial discretion in provisioning is strongly linked to income smoothing, capital management, signalling and other objectives. We also address several issues including the ethical dimensions of income smoothing, motivations and constrains to income smoothing, methodological issues in the bank loan loss provisions literature and the dynamic loan loss provisioning experiment. Moreover, we suggest several avenues for further research such as: finding a balance between sufficient LLPs which regulators want versus transparent LLPs which standard setters want; the sensitivity of abnormal (specific and general) LLPs to changes in equity; the persistence of abnormal LLPs following CEO exit; country-specific interventions that induce LLP procyclicality in emerging countries; investigating LLP behaviour in the post-financial crisis sample period; the impact of Basel III on banks’ provisioning discretion; LLP behaviour among systemic and non-systemic financial institutions; etc. We conclude that, because provisioning models are only as good as the assumptions underlying such models as well as the accuracy of the inputs included in such models, regulators need to pay attention to how much discretion banks and lending institutions should have in determining reported provision estimates, and this has been a long standing issue.

Keywords: banks; dynamic provisioning; business cycles; loan loss provisions; income smoothing; procyclicality; capital management; signalling; accounting discretion; islamic banking; financial crisis; Europe; Africa; US; Asia; Australia; financial institutions; risk management

JEL Classification: G21; G28; M14; M52; G32; G35; E32; E44

Suggested Citation

Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu and Outa, Erick Rading, Bank Loan Loss Provisions Research: A Review (2017). Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 144-163. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2905874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2905874

Peterson Kitakogelu Ozili (Contact Author)

University of Essex - Essex Business School ( email )

Wivenhoe Park
Colchester, CO4 3SQ
United Kingdom

Central Bank of Nigeria ( email )

Plot 33, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa Way
Central Business District, Cadastral Zone
Abuja
Nigeria

Erick Rading Outa

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
413
rank
68,732
Abstract Views
1,149
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information