The Predictable Disarray: Ignoring the Jury in Florida Death Penalty Cases

15 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2017

See all articles by Michael Radelet

Michael Radelet

University of Colorado at Boulder - Institute of Behavioral Sciences

G. Ben Cohen

University of Akron - School of Law

Date Written: January 18, 2017

Abstract

Both the United States Supreme Court, and the Florida Supreme Court have now made it clear that the Florida death penalty statutes that have been in use over the past 45 years are unconstitutional. This result has been predicted since the original adoption of the statutes, and made clear by the Supreme Court's decisions in Sullivan v. Louisiana, Apprendi v. New Jersey, and Ring v. Arizona. How the courts address the 393 prisoners currently on Florida's death row, sentenced to death under an unconstitutional statute, is yet to be determined. This paper reviews the history of the Florida death penalty statutes and provides a census of cases in Florida.

Keywords: Hurst, Ring, Florida Death Penalty

Suggested Citation

Radelet, Michael and Cohen, G. Ben, The Predictable Disarray: Ignoring the Jury in Florida Death Penalty Cases (January 18, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2906342 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906342

Michael Radelet

University of Colorado at Boulder - Institute of Behavioral Sciences ( email )

Boulder, CO 80309
United States

G. Ben Cohen (Contact Author)

University of Akron - School of Law ( email )

150 University Ave
Akron, OH 44325
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
372
Abstract Views
1,877
Rank
168,175
PlumX Metrics