ADR in Japan's Financial Markets & the Rule of Law

65 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2017 Last revised: 10 Feb 2017

See all articles by Tomohiko Maeda

Tomohiko Maeda

Meijo University

Andrew Pardieck

Southern Illinois University School of Law

Date Written: January 1, 2017

Abstract

One practitioner recently described the number of cases resolved in private alternative dispute resolution in Japan simply as “unsatisfactory”. That statement aptly describes efforts to mediate disputes arising between financial service providers and their customers up to 2008. But in 2008 things changed: Japan amended each of the statutes regulating its principal financial industries, including the banking, insurance, and securities industries. In doing so, it established Japan’s Financial ADR System. Claimants have used this system in large numbers: in some industries, they are mediating more claims than they are filing in the courts. And they do so voluntarily. There are no mandatory mediation or arbitration clauses that require a customer to arbitrate or mediate instead of litigate. The system is far from perfect: practitioners and scholars find much to dislike. But there is also evidence to suggest that there are meaningful benefits: it offers speedy and inexpensive resolution of claims that are unlikely to be litigated. And the resolution is, on average, reasonable when measured against litigated outcomes. It reaches this result not by limiting the role of legal professionals and access to the courts, as found in previous statutorily-imposed alternative dispute resolution schemes. Instead, it does so by relying on legal professionals and judicially established norms. The numbers suggest Japan’s Financial ADR System warrants a closer look, which is what this article does.

Keywords: Japan, ADR, alternative dispute resolution, mediation, financial markets, securities law, rule of law, comparative fault

JEL Classification: K22, K33, K41

Suggested Citation

Maeda, Tomohiko and Pardieck, Andrew, ADR in Japan's Financial Markets & the Rule of Law (January 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2911273 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2911273

Tomohiko Maeda

Meijo University ( email )

Japan
+81-52-833-7247 (Fax)

Andrew Pardieck (Contact Author)

Southern Illinois University School of Law ( email )

1150 Douglas Drive
Carbondale, IL 62901-6804
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
335
rank
347,173
PlumX Metrics