Journal of Integral Theory and Practice | June 2014 | 9(1) | 38–54
17 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2017
Date Written: June 1, 2014
In previous work I explored how Integral Theory can be applied as a metatheoretical and transdisciplinary framework, in an attempt to arrive at an integrally informed metatheory of addiction. There was an overemphasis on Integral Methodological Pluralism in that thread of research, without clarifying the ontological pluralism of addiction as a multiple object enacted by various methodologies. To arrive at a comprehensive integral metatheory and integral ontology of addiction, I believe it is necessary to include the conception of Integral Pluralism and Integral Enactment Theory as posited by Sean Esbjörn-Hargens. Integral Enactment Theory highlights the phenomenon of addiction as a multiple and dynamic object arising along a continuum of ontological complexity; it adeptly points out how etiological models “co-arise” in relation to methodology (methodological pluralism) to enact a particular reality of addiction (ontological pluralism) while being mediated by the worldview of the subject (epistemological pluralism) applying the method. This article briefly explores the significance of including Integral Pluralism and Integral Enactment Theory in the quest of an integral metatheory and integral ontology of addiction.
Keywords: addiction, ontology, Integral Pluralism, etiology
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Du Plessis, Guy Pierre, An Integral Ontology of Addiction (June 1, 2014). Journal of Integral Theory and Practice | June 2014 | 9(1) | 38–54. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912154