Classical Rational Basis and the Right to Be Free of Arbitrary Legislation

23 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2017

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

The modern rational basis test used in cases such as Williamson v. Lee Optical and FCC v. Beach Communications is not the “classical” rational basis test that our constitutional tradition demands. Despite the triumphant statements of its adherents, this formulation of the rational basis test is not the traditional test for arbitrary legislative acts that our constitutional tradition recognizes, nor is it required for our constitutional system to properly function.

Although the modern rational basis test has many features to dislike, its primary failing from a constitutional standpoint is simply this: The test itself does not do what it is designed to do. The purpose of the rational basis test, admitted by even those who cite Williamson or FCC v. Beach Communications with favor, is to prohibit irrational or arbitrary legislation. However, because the modern rational basis test operates on the basis of what the legislature “could have thought,” without regard to what the legislature’s actual purpose was or whether that purpose or any other legitimate purpose is actually served by the legislation, it is the judicial equivalent of no test at all. Because almost any possible legislation can be justified under modern rational basis review, the modern rational basis test deprives persons from one of the great rights underpinning our constitutional system: The right not to be subjected to arbitrary legislation.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Rational Basis, Arbitrary Legislation

Suggested Citation

Jackson, Jeffrey D., Classical Rational Basis and the Right to Be Free of Arbitrary Legislation (2016). 14 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'Y 493 (2016), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912352

Jeffrey D. Jackson (Contact Author)

Washburn University - School of Law ( email )

1700 College Avenue
Topeka, KS 66621
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
149
Abstract Views
737
Rank
418,624
PlumX Metrics