The Letter and the Spirit: The Judicial Duty of Good-Faith Constitutional Construction

Randy E. Barnett

Georgetown University Law Center

Evan Bernick

Institute for Justice


The concept of constitutional construction is of central importance to originalist theory but is both underdeveloped and controversial among originalists. Some object that its apparent open-endedness undermines the judge-constraining virtues of originalism and exposes the citizenry to arbitrary judicial power. In this Article, we respond to this challenge with a theory of constitutional construction that can guide and constrain judicial activity within the “construction zone.” Our theory draws upon a familiar concept in contract law that is used to handle the problem of contractual discretion: the duty of good-faith performance.

We contend that judges who take an oath to “support this Constitution” enter into a fiduciary relationship with private citizens — a relationship characterized by discretionary powers in the hands of officials and a corresponding vulnerability in the citizenry. As fiduciaries, judges are morally and legally bound to follow the instructions given them in “this Constitution” in good faith. This means that judges engaging in constitutional construction or implementation must seek to give legal effect to both the Constitution’s “letter” (consisting in its original public meaning) and its “spirit” (consisting in the original function or purpose of its particular provisions.)

Therefore, when original meaning interpretation alone is not enough to resolve a controversy, the judicial duty of good-faith construction consists in (a) accurately identifying the spirit of the relevant constitutional provision at the time it was enacted and (b) devising implementing rules that are calculated to give effect to both the letter and the spirit of the text in the case at hand and in future cases. Conversely, bad-faith construction consists of a court exploiting the discretionary process of implementing the Constitution by evading either its original letter or spirit (or both) to recapture an opportunity forgone by adopting the written Constitution as amended.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 8, 2017  

Suggested Citation

Barnett, Randy E. and Bernick, Evan, The Letter and the Spirit: The Judicial Duty of Good-Faith Constitutional Construction (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2913223

Contact Information

Randy E. Barnett (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9936 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.randybarnett.com
Evan Bernick
Institute for Justice ( email )
901 N. Glebe Road
Arlington, VA 22203
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 585
Downloads: 240
Download Rank: 106,551