Self-Censorship in Conflicts: Israel and the 1948 Palestinian Exodus

Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 479-499, 2015

22 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2017

See all articles by Rafi Nets-Zehngut

Rafi Nets-Zehngut

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Ruthie Pliskin

Independent

Daniel Bar-Tal

Tel Aviv University - Department of Child Development and Education

Date Written: February 21, 2015

Abstract

The typical collective memories of societies involved in intractable conflicts play a major role in the eruption and continuation of the conflicts, whereas the positive transformation of these memories to being less self-serving promotes peacemaking. A major factor that inhibits such transformation is self-censorship. Self-censorship, prac- ticed by members of a society’s formal institutions, inhibits the dissemination of alternative, more accurate narratives of the conflict that may change dominating biased conflict-supporting memories. Despite the importance of formal self-censorship in maintaining collective memories of conflicts, little empirical and theoretical research has examined this phenomenon. The present study addresses this omission. It examines the self-censorship practiced from 1949 to 2004 in 3 formal Israeli institutions (the National Information Center, the IDF/army, and the Ministry of Education) regarding the main historical event of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus. This is done by analyzing all of these institutions’ publications produced throughout the 56-year research period and interviewing their key position holders. The results show that the institution gatekeepers practiced self-censorship for 5 reasons: garnering international support, mobilizing citizens, the impact of Zionist ideology, institutional norms, and fear of sanctions. The empirical findings are used to elicit theoretical insights, such as a definition for formal self-censorship, the difference between self-censorship practiced by gatekeepers (from formal and informal institu- tions) and that practiced by ordinary individuals, the 5 reasons for such self-censorship (distinguishing between 2 categories—intrinsic and extrinsic reasons), and the reasons that led the gatekeepers to admit that they had self-censored.

Keywords: collective memory, narratives, official memory, Palestinian refugee problem, self-censorship

Suggested Citation

Nets-Zehngut, Rafi and Pliskin, Ruthie and Bar-Tal, Daniel, Self-Censorship in Conflicts: Israel and the 1948 Palestinian Exodus (February 21, 2015). Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 479-499, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2915764

Rafi Nets-Zehngut (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem ( email )

Israel

Ruthie Pliskin

Independent ( email )

No Address Available
United States

Daniel Bar-Tal

Tel Aviv University - Department of Child Development and Education ( email )

P.O. Box 39040
Tel Aviv, 6997801
Israel
972-3-6408473 (Phone)
972-3-6409477 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
183
PlumX Metrics