Aesthetic Nondiscrimination & Fair Use

22 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2017

See all articles by Brian L. Frye

Brian L. Frye

University of Kentucky - College of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2017


While courts do not consider the aesthetic value of an element of a work in determining whether it is protected by copyright, they do consider the aesthetic value of the use of a copyrighted element of a work in determining whether that use is a fair use. This asymmetry improperly and inefficiently discriminates in favor of copyright protection and against fair use. Moreover, the fair use transformativeness inquiry discriminates against marginalized authors, because courts are less likely to appreciate the aesthetic value of their uses of copyrighted works. Courts should apply the aesthetic nondiscrimination principle to both copyright and fair use. In other words, “transformative” should just mean “different,” and courts evaluating a fair use claim should simply ask whether the use changes the copyrighted work in any way, including context, and should not ask whether that change is substantial or valuable. While this would substantially narrow the scope of the derivative works right, it would almost certainly increase social welfare by encouraging the production of derivative works without materially affecting the incentives to create works of authorship.

Keywords: Fair use, aesthetic values, copyright, aesthetic nondiscrimination, transformativeness in fair use

Suggested Citation

Frye, Brian L., Aesthetic Nondiscrimination & Fair Use (2017). 3 Belmont Law Review 29 (2016), Belmont University College of Law Research Paper No. 2-2017, Available at SSRN:

Brian L. Frye (Contact Author)

University of Kentucky - College of Law ( email )

620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States


Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics