Self-Plagiarism

16 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2017 Last revised: 27 Jan 2019

See all articles by Josh Blackman

Josh Blackman

South Texas College of Law Houston

Date Written: February 17, 2017

Abstract

The Harvard Law Review invited me contribute to its annual Supreme Court issue, with a comment concerning two cases I had previously written about. I did what I suspect most other scholars would do: preface my new analysis with earlier writings. The Review objected. Thus began my crash course with a concept I had never before considered: “self-plagiarism.”

This essay analyzes the ethical, legal, and professional implications of copying from one’s prior work, including “recycled text,” “reporting,” and “arguments.” Legal scholarship has largely ignored this important issue, which has been developed by other disciplines.

While I am sympathetic to journalistic concerns about originality, Professors who build up a body of work over time should not be expected to completely reinvent every wheel for each new published article. At bottom, there truly is nothing new under the sun.

Keywords: Self-Plagiarism, Ethics, Publishing

Suggested Citation

Blackman, Josh, Self-Plagiarism (February 17, 2017). Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 641, 2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2919642 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2919642

Josh Blackman (Contact Author)

South Texas College of Law Houston ( email )

1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
667
Abstract Views
2,923
rank
42,232
PlumX Metrics